State v. Crews’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 827 So. 2d 488 - State v. Murray (2002), 756 So. 2d 1272 - State v. Roddy (2000)
71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dorthey · 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · Cryts v. French · 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square · State v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To justify a warrantless search, the state must show that the search falls within one of the narrowly drawn exceptions to the warrant requirement. State v. Barrett, 408 So.2d 903 (La.1981). A consensual search is an exception to both the warrant and probable cause requirements. State v. Walker, 530 So.2d 1200 (La.App. 2d Cir.[1988]), writ denied, 532 So.2d 763 (La.1988). Oral consent is valid. However, consent to a search must be given freely and voluntarily, and the burden of proof on this issue rests upon the state. State v. Ossey, 446 So.2d 280 (La.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 916 , 105 S.Ct. 293 , 83 L.Ed.2d 228 (1984). State v. Haygood, 26,102 (La.App.2d Cir.8/17/94), 641 So.2d 1074 , writ denied, 94-2373 (La.1/13/95), 648 So.2d 1337 . When reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress, based on findings of fact, great weight is placed upon the trial court's determination because it had the opportunity to observe the witnesses and weigh the credibility of their testimony. State v. Jackson, 26,138 (La.App.2d Cir.8/17/94), 641 So.2d 1081 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.