Robbs v. State Ex Rel. Whetstone’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2012
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 391 So. 2d 133 - Dolvin v. State · Pumphrey v. State · Dominguez v. United States · 627 So. 2d 874 - Ex Parte Carroll · Hamilton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In a § 20-2-93 , Ala. Code 1975, forfeiture proceeding, the State may establish a prima facie case by showing that the item to be forfeited was used, or intended to be used, in violation of the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act. Culpepper v. State , 587 So.2d 359 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991). The standard of that proof is reasonable satisfaction. Agee v. State ex rel. Galanos , 627 So.2d 960 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993). . . . "When evidence is presented ore tenus, the judgment of the trial court is presumed correct and will be affirmed if it is supported by competent evidence, unless it is shown to be palpably wrong. Culpepper ."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`used to facilitate a violation of the Alabama Controlled Substances Law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.