674 So. 2d 1365 - Ex Parte Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Trawick (1997), 725 So. 2d 1003 - Price v. State (1997)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Diaz v. United States · 9221 Associates v. Industrial State Bank · Holm v. United States · Proffitt v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 9.2(b) provides that an accused who has been previously removed from the courtroom or restrained has the right to return to the courtroom if the accused can assure the court that he or she will not again disrupt the proceedings. Rule 9.2(c) directs the trial court to provide the accused removed from the trial with the ability to hear, observe, and be informed of, the remaining portions of the trial or proceeding. The Alabama Supreme Court, in keeping with the above principles of law, has recognized that a defendant in a capital murder case may”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“State law and Federal law secure the right of a defendant accused of a capital crime to be present during all phases of the trial; without the defendant's presence at every stage, the court has no jurisdiction to pronounce judgment against the defendant. Diaz v. United States , 223 U.S. 442 , 32 S.Ct. 250 , 56 L.Ed. 500 (1912); Ex parte Hammond , 510 So.2d 153 (Ala. 1987); Lee v. State , 244 Ala. 401 , 13 So.2d 590 (1943); Speer v. State , 570 So.2d 1271 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990); Proffitt v. Wainwright , 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. 1982).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"The trial court may refuse an instruction on a lesser included offense if it is clear to the judicial mind that there is no rational basis to support the instruction. Dill v. State, 600 So.2d 343 (Ala.Crim.App.1991), affirmed, 600 So.2d 372 (Ala.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 924 , 113 S.Ct. 1293 , 122 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993)."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peraita v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.