Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

674 So. 2d 761

Norris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-04-12

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2007

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Scott Norris, also known as Brian Scott Norris (Norris), appeals his convictions and his adult sentences. We agree with the State that Norris properly was sentenced as an adult, and that no double jeopardy violation exists. The State properly concedes however that Norris’s grand theft conviction in case number 94-5285 must be corrected to reflect a conviction for merely petit theft.

¶2We therefore affirm Norris’s convictions and sentences with the exception of his conviction for grand theft. We vacate Norris’s grand theft conviction and remand for correction of Norris’s judgment and sentence accordingly.

MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.WEBSTER, J., concurs with written opinion.
/674/so2d/761 · .json · Public domain