Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

674 So. 2d 901

Docket No. 95-01170.

State v. Pope

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Heather F. POPE, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-31

Relies on State v. Earl

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-05-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2018

5 state decisions

30199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

¶2James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Clearwater, for Appellee.

¶3RYDER, Judge.

¶4The state contests the dismissal of an aggravated battery charge filed against the appellee, Heather F. Pope. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in not proceeding in accordance with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶5The appellee did not file a written motion to dismiss as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(a). Instead, the appellee's counsel orally moved to dismiss the information near the conclusion of a hearing on another pretrial motion after a limited discussion about the possibility of dropping the case. The state strongly objected to the dismissal. The state was, therefore, precluded from placing its position or version of the facts before the court as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(d). See State v. Earl,545 So.2d 415, 416 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

¶6Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

¶7THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

/674/so2d/901 · .json · Public domain