Hopping v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · State v. Callaway · Davis v. State · 283 So. 2d 857 - Troupe v. Rowe · 674 So. 2d 123 - Justice v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In the instant case, it can be determined `as a matter of law without an evidentiary [hearing]' that Hopping's sentence was increased upon resentencing in violation of the double jeopardy clause. Thus, as Judge Benton concisely reasoned, the sentence should not be unreachable under a rule expressly intended to correct illegal sentences...."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Blakley v. State“WHETHER A SENTENCE WHICH VIOLATES DOUBLE JEOPARDY PRINCIPLES ACCORDING TO TROUPE v. ROWE, 283 So.2d 857 (Fla.1973), IS AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE COGNIZABLE UNDER RULE 3.800(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hopping v. State“an illegal sentence ... [in] that [it] exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard to the guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Hopping v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.