674 So. 2d 96 - Geralds v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

cited by 82 later decisions

states following

July 2019

most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 762 So. 2d 879 - Brooks v. State (2000), 702 So. 2d 186 - Chandler v. State (1997)

80 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Soberon v. United States · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Brewster v. Derwinski · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Andrijevic v. Kelleran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“(1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness's presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would have been forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Ostolaza v. State · State v. J.G.
“cross examination is not confined to the identical details testified to in chief, but extends to its entire subject matter, and to all matters that may modify, supplement, contradict, rebut, or make clearer the facts testified to in chief.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Garcia v. State · Troy v. State
“[H]aving carefully scrutinized the record in this case, including the jury’s unanimous recommendation of death, we are persuaded beyond a reasonable doubt that even without the aggravating circumstance of cold, calculated, and premeditated murder, the trial court still would have found that the aggravating factors present here substantially outweighed the mitigating evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Geralds v. State · 901 So. 2d 810 - Bryant v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.