Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

674 S.W.2d 158

Pinky v. Winer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1984

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1984-06-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1993

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CRIST, Presiding Judge,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I dissent.

¶3It is common knowledge an applied bandage must not cut off blood circulation. But, the cause of the condition found in the pathologist’s report may, or may not, have been caused by the doctor’s bandage. Competent evidence of causation is lacking. The lack of expert testimony was fatal to plaintiff’s case. I would affirm the judgment denying recovery.

/674/sw2d/158 · .json · Public domain