Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 675 F.2d 430 - United States v. Boyle

United States v. Boyle’s Empirical Analysis

675 F.2d 430 · 1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
5
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 158 Ill. 2d 319 - People v. Coleman (1994), United States v. Guerrero (1984)

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

1301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Cleveland v. United States · Rachal v. United States · United States v. Myers · United States v. Ballard · United States v. Eatherton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t would be reasonable to infer from the use of an alias only some six days after the unmasked bank holdup that the defendant was seeking to conceal his true identity from police investigating this fresh crime. Certainly we find little to commend defendant’s broad proposal to bar ‘alias’ evidence whenever a defendant has committed more than one crime. Under it, the more crimes a person commits using an alias, the less able the prosecutor would be to use the alias as evidence. Such a rule would ignore the substantial possibility that the defendant is using the alias to evade detection for all of his crimes, including the one charged.” 675 F.2d at 432-33 (emphasis in original).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.