Hang Chen v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
675 F.3d 100 · 2012
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 6 U.S.C. § 202 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Jian Hui Shao v. Mukasey · Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration Appeals · Qin Wen Zheng v. Gonzales · Kazlauskas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“each piece of evidence need not be discussed in a [BIA or IJ] decision,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The BIA has discretion to deem a document's lack of authentication a telling factor weighing against its evidentiary value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabas v. Barr“may constitute 'substantial evidence' for the purposes of reviewing immigration decisions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Justo v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.