United States v. Schaefer’s Empirical Analysis
675 F.3d 1122 · 2012
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Stults · United States v. Davis · United States v. Kreitinger · United States v. Kelly · United States v. Smart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen crafting a special condition of supervised release, the district court must make an individualized inquiry into the facts and circumstances underlying a case and make sufficient findings on the record so as to ensure that the special condition satisfies the statutory requirements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“While this court encourages detailed findings, it is enough that the basis for the imposed condition can be discerned from the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a district court may not impose conditions on the basis of pure speculation or assumptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.