Jabri v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
675 F.3d 20 · 2012
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gailius v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Javier Bernal-Vallejo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Cordero-Trejo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Santos Manuel Bojorques-Villanueva v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Rivas-Mira v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“recognize that aggregation may support an adverse credibility finding even if the underlying discrepancies are immaterial and 'do not go to the heart of the applicant's claim.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“although assignments are within the agency's discretion, given the prior credibility determination, confidence would be enhanced if the matter were assigned to a different IJ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.