Bader v. Wrenn’s Empirical Analysis
675 F.3d 95 · 2012
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Meachum v. Fano · Cutter et al. v. Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction · Lovelace v. Lee · Washington v. Klem · Hannon v. Beard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a lack of outside clergy, volunteer visitors, and practicing co-religionists in the prison,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wright v. Lassiter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.