Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

675 F. App'x 334

Boyd v. Tesemma

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2017

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2017-02-02

Decided 2017-02-02

¶1Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶2Gary Andrew Boyd appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boyd v. Tesemma, No. 2:14-cv-00196-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 26, 2016 & entered Apr. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3AFFIRMED

/675/fappx/334 · .json · Public domain