Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 675 NE2D 1119 - Bader v. Johnson

Bader v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Becker v. Schwartz · 31 Cal. 3d 220 - Turpin v. Sortini · Berman v. Allan · Naccash v. Burger · 98 Wash. 2d 460 - Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By limiting damages to those expenses that are actually attributable to the affliction, we are not conferring a windfall on Mr. and Mrs. Schroeder. Although they may derive pleasure from Thomas, that pleasure will be derived in spite of, rather than because of, his affliction. Mr. and Mrs. Schroeder will receive no compensating pleasure from incurring extraordinary medical expenses on behalf of Thomas. There is no joy in watching a child suffer and die from cystic fibrosis. [ Id. at 69, 432 A. 2d 834 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “When ... a plaintiff sustains a direct impact by the negligence of another and, by virtue of that direct involvement sustains an emotional trauma which is serious in nature and of a kind and extent normally expected to occur in a reasonable person, we hold that such a plaintiff is entitled to maintain an action to recover for that emotional trauma without regard to whether the emotional trauma arises out of or accompanies any physical injury to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The phrase “wrongful birth” applies to claims brought by the parents of a child born with birth defects alleging that due to negligent medical advice or testing they were precluded from an informed decision about whether to conceive a potentially handicapped child or, in the event of a pregnancy, to terminate it. When such action seeks damages on behalf of the child rather than the parents, the phrase “wrongful life” instead of “wrongful birth” is employed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.