State v. Douglas’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stanley v. United States · State v. Ware · State v. Polly · State v. Bugely · State v. Berney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the facts and circumstances are undisputed and permit only one inference, whether a witness is an accomplice is a question of law for the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In view of the contrary inferences that could be drawn from the evidence, it was for the jury to choose which inferences were warranted under the testimony given at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the testimony of an accomplice and the confession of a defendant constitute acceptable corroboration, one for the other”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.