State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Murphy v. Florida · United States v. Gigax · United States v. Trapnell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when requested by counsel to poll the jury regarding publicity during the trial, the trial court must rule as a matter of law whether the publicity is potentially prejudicial or not prejudicial at all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Daughton“If the publicity is potentially prejudicial, then the [trial] court must question the jurors regarding their exposure and their understanding of it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Daughton“could, in fact, work to a defendant's disadvantage by annoying the jurors and creating an atmosphere of suspicion and distrust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Daughton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.