Hadden v. Cirelli’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2011
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 645 So. 2d 422 - Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh · 520 So. 2d 9 - Sharp v. Hamilton · 354 So. 2d 137 - Liberman v. Kelso · 394 So. 2d 226 - Holt v. Boozel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“61.075 Equitable distribution of marital assets and liabilities. (4) The judgment distributing assets shall have the effect of a duly executed instrument of conveyance, transfer, release, or acquisition which is recorded in the county where the property is located when the judgment or a certified copy of the judgment is recorded in the official records of the county in which the property is located.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A final dissolution judgment can transfer a party’s interest in real property when the language of the judgment specifically operates to transfer an interest or recognizes a specific interest ... [those] cases are factually distinguishable because the language in the dissolution judgments was self-executing; that is, the language either actually transferred a property interest from one spouse to another ... In contrast, the Haddens’ 1978 dissolution judgment was not self-executing ... The .judgment merely incorporated the terms of the parties’-settlement agreement and then directed the father to transfer his interest ... When he failed to comply, the judgment did not automatically operate to transfer his interest ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.