Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

675 So. 2d 1050

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-07-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1996

1 state decisions

Relies on Russell v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

¶2This court withdraws its per curiam affir-mance of May 15, 1996 and substitutes the following opinion.

¶3The court affirms the conviction of defendant, but strikes that portion of the final judgment which assesses prospective appellate costs. See Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

KLEIN, PARIENTE and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/675/so2d/1050 · .json · Public domain