Local 100 v. Forrest’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2024
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396R (§ 1919 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 450 So. 2d 933 - Title Research Corp. v. Rausch · Clausen v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland · 371 So. 2d 316 - Webb v. City of Shreveport · Compton v. Compton · State v. Harper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] court must determine not only whether the individual has an actual or subjective expectation of privacy, but whether that expectation is also of a type which society at large is prepared to recognize as being reasonable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If a reasonable expectation of privacy is found, then and only then, need we weigh or balance the public records or documents disclosure interest against the privacy interest....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no person shall be denied the right to examine public documents except in cases established by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.