Raley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably 848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride (2003), Harris v. State (2000)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Callaway · Davis v. State · 479 So. 2d 114 - METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co. · 471 So. 2d 38 - The Florida Bar in Re Inglis · 591 So. 2d 930 - Karchesky v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our court has decided to adopt the second district's interpretation of the limited nature of rule 3.800(a) proceedings: Rule 3.800 is intended to provide relief for a narrow category of cases in which the sentence imposes a penalty that is simply not authorized by law. It is concerned primarily with whether the terms and conditions of the punishment for a particular offense are permissible as a matter of law. It is not a vehicle designed to re-examine whether the procedure employed to impose the punishment comported with statutory law and due process. Unlike a motion pursuant to rule 3.850, the motion can be filed without an oath because it is designed to test issues that should not involve significant questions of fact or require a lengthy evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We detect no indication from our reading of Davis and Callaway that our supreme court intends to eliminate this alternative basis for post-conviction relief by retreating from the decision in State v. Whitfield, 487 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1986), which amended rule 3.800 to specifically authorize such relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Even though such an allegation does not appear to articulate a valid claim of illegality under Davis and Callaway , the allegation sets forth a valid basis for post-conviction relief because rule 3.800(a) specifically authorizes the trial court to correct scoresheet errors at any time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.