Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

675 So. 2d 258

Wilkes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-06-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1996

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · United Biscuit Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission · New York Central R. Co. v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-06-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders1 appeal, the judgment and sentence are affirmed in all respects except we strike the court ordered assessment of costs to First Step, see Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (en banc), and the $2.00 per month assessment to the Correctional Officer Training Fund. The sentencing form does not indicate the statutory authority for the latter fee. See Drake v. State, 644 So.2d 179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

¶2AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.

¶3W. SHARP, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

¶4. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967).

/675/so2d/258 · .json · Public domain