Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

675 So. 2d 415

Maples v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1996

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1996-03-01

Relies on Horsley v. Horsley

Decided 1996-03-01

INGRAM, Justice.

¶1After carefully reviewing the record, we quash the writ of certiorari as having been improvidently granted.

¶2We note that the Court of Criminal Appeals incorrectly stated in its unpublished memorandum that the defendant had worked for the employer before her conviction. The record reflects that the defendant worked for the employer after her conviction. This, however, does not affect our decision to quash the writ of certiorari as having been improvidently granted. See Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

¶3WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, COOK, and BUTTS, JJ., concur.
/675/so2d/415 · .json · Public domain