Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 675 SO2D 817 - Ducote v. McCrossen

Ducote v. McCrossen’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 635 So. 2d 401 - Whitney Nat. Bank v. McCrossen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]o long as an action is pending and affects title to immovable property, then the notice of lis pendens giving notice of that action is proper and the merits of the pending action do not affect the propriety of the notice of lis pendens.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of a notice of lis pendens is to give effective notice to third persons of the pendency of litigation affecting title to real property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “affecting the title to, or asserting a mortgage or privilege on, immovable property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.