Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 675 SW2D 754 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably Cooks v. State (1992), Webb v. State (1988)

34 state decisions

1201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. State · Ex Parte Lewis · Ex Parte Reynolds · Resnick v. State · Ex Parte March

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the trial court number of the prior conviction; (2) the correct name of the court where the prior conviction was taken; (3) the date of the prior conviction; (4) the term of years of the prior conviction; and (5) the nature of the prior conviction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the punishment herein adjudged against the Defendant, Jimmy Wayne Matheson, shall begin when the judgment and sentence in Cause No. 21,-812, Attempted Capital Murder with a Deadly Weapon, shall have ceased to operate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “while a cumulation order may be placed in both the judgment and sentence, a cumulation order placed only in the sentence is valid.” 675 S.W.2d at 763 . 2 . As the Court of Criminal Appeals said in Williams :”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.