Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 F.2d 1144 - Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal American Society of Composers Authors and Publishers

Amusement and Music Operators Association v. Copyright Royalty Tribunal American Society of Composers Authors and Publishers’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2011

2 district · 1 state decisions

301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Camp v. Pitts · Permian Basin Area Rate Cases · Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation · Mahan v. Howell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) To maximize the availability of creative works to the public; (B) To afford the copyright owner a fair return for his creative work and the copyright user a fair income under existing economic conditions; (C) To reflect the relative roles of the copyright owner and the copyright user in the product made available to the public with respect to relative creative contribution, technological contribution, capital investment, cost, risk, and contribution to the opening of new markets for creative expression and media for their communication; (D) To minimize any disruptive impact on the structure of the industries involved and on generally prevailing industry practices.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a cost of living or other inflation adjustment designed to maintain the real value of the fee set by the Tribunal is not prohibited but is instead affirmatively supported by the language of the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “carefully weighed the evidence derived from the marketplace analogies and other evidence specifically in light of the four statutory criteria of section 801(b).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.