Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 F.2d 126 - Flannery v. Carroll

Flannery v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

676 F.2d 126 · 1982

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Chandler v. City of Dallas (1993), Simon v. United States (1990)

48 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

32019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77

Relies on Goldman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · Chambers v. United States · Allen v. United States Steel Corp. · Rivera v. United States · Hodges v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Once the [pretrial] order is entered, it controls the scope and course of the trial. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16. If a claim or issue is omitted from the order, it is waived.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “defendant would be facing the possibility of being held liable under a claim it had no opportunity to evaluate and defend against.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “directs the court to order appropriate relief; it does not permit the court to impose liability where none has been established”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.