Winter v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
676 F.2d 276 · 1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 2020
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · Miller v. Youakim · Thompson v. Hensley · Caldwell v. Blum · William Greklek v. Philip L. Toia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“42 C.F.R. § 435.800 , consisted of persons with large medical expenses who met the non-financial requirements for cash assistance (e.g., were aged, blind, or disabled), but who had incomes higher than the maximum eligibility levels for those programs. 42 U.S.C. § 1396d(a). Persons in the medically needy group became eligible for Medicaid by incurring medical expenses equal to the amount by which their total income exceeded the income of those who receive cash welfare assistance. Thus, these persons were required to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“§ 209(b) required states to operate a program assisting the medically needy. Providing Medicaid coverage to the medically needy was no longer optional for states using the § 209(b) option.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roloff v. Sullivan“threatened to swell the Medicaid rolls and place a large and immediate fiscal burden on participating states.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.