Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 F.2d 352 - Buschmann v. Schweiker

Buschmann v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis

676 F.2d 352 · 1982

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Alcaraz v. Block (1984), Gifford Pinchot Task Force v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service (2004)

57 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

4401982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(B) when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “when a mistake of the administrative body is one that clearly had no bearing on the procedure used or the substance of decision reached.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he good cause exception is essentially an emergency procedure,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.