Santise v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
676 F.2d 925 · 1982
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 23 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2015 · most notably Heckler v. Campbell (1983), McCoy v. Schweiker (1982)
27 federal appellate · 23 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'may not be fully applicable' where a claimant suffers from non-exertional, instead of or in addition to exertional, impairments”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. If the claimant is working or doing substantial gainful activity, a finding of not disabled is directed. If not, proceed to Step 2. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (b). 2. If the claimant is found not to have a severe impairment which significantly limits his or her physical or mental ability to do basic work activity, a finding of not disabled is directed. . If there is a severe impairment, proceed to Step 3. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (c). 3.If the impairment meets or equals criteria for a listed impairment or impairments in Appendix 1 of Subpart P of Part 404 of 20 C.F.R., a finding of disabled is directed. If not, proceed to Step 4. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (d). 4. If the claimant retains residual functional capacity to perform past relevant work, a finding of not disabled is directed. If it is determined that the claimant cannot do the kind of work he or she performed in the past, proceed to Step 5. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (e). 5. The Commissioner will then consider the claimant’s residual functional capacity, age, education, and past work experience in conjunction with the criteria listed in Appendix 2 to determine if the claimant is or is not disabled. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (1).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i)n fiscal 1976, for example, the agency's ALJs disposed of 180,000 cases; by contrast, during that same time period, only 130,000 civil and criminal matters were terminated by the entire Article III court system. Approximately 8,000 appeals were brought in 1978 from agency disability-related determinations to the federal district courts; this litigation 'constitute(d) the largest portion of the workload of the federal judiciary from federal agencies.' " Santise v. Schweiker, supra, 676 F.2d at 930, quoting Dobrowolsky v. Califano, 606 F.2d 403 , 409 n.18 (3d Cir. 1979). See also K. Davis, 3 Administrative Law Treatise § 15.18 at 199 (1980). Moreover, since the issue at stake-the existence of jobs anywhere in the national economy-involves "legislative,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.