Cross v. Sisto’s Empirical Analysis
676 F.3d 1172 · 2012
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Pace v. Superintendent State Correctional Institution at Graterford · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Carey Warden v. Saffold · In Re Dixon · 9 Cal. 4th 464 - People v. Duvall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reviews de novo the district court's dismissal of a § 2254 petition on timeliness grounds.” The majority contends that Stewart departs from this standard of review by arguing that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stewart v. Cate“dismissal without prejudice, with leave to amend to plead required facts with particularity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Seeboth v. Allenby“a citation to Swain by itself [is not] conclusive proof of untimeliness”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.