Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 F.3d 1368 - Githens v. Shinseki

Githens v. Shinseki’s Empirical Analysis

676 F.3d 1368 · 2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 7292

Relies on Forshey v. Principi · Cook v. Principi · Szemraj v. Principi · Santana-Venegas v. Principi · Bobby Glass Carol Rose Gary Stillwell Stephen Strickland Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or in violation of a statutory right; or (D) without observance of procedure required by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.