Wickware v. Johns Manville’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · Simms v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a plaintiff's exhaustion of his or her administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit under Title VII-not merely a condition precedent to suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cirocco v. McMahon“Gad raises the question of whether the district court's jurisdictional rationale here remains legally viable,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cirocco v. McMahon“[c]onsequently, even if exhaustion is not jurisdictional, it is a condition precedent to suit”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cirocco v. McMahon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.