Casey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Newman v. State (1999), Lainhart v. State (2009)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Indiana Department of Human Services v. Firth · Hansford v. State · McCollum v. State · Boyd v. State · Pruitt v. Indiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is apparent that the legislature intended to require the State to prove that the victim had engaged in a prior act, which was not contrary to law, and that the defendant intended to repay the victim for the prior lawful act.... [T]he State must establish that the legal act occurred prior to the threat and that the defendant intended to place the victim in fear of retaliation for that act.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) A person who communicates a threat to another person, with the intent that: (1) the other person engage in conduct against his will; or (2) the other person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act; commits intimidation, a Class A misdemeanor.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State · JT v. State“'[I]t is apparent that the legislature intended to require the State to prove that the victim had engaged in a prior act, which was not contrary to the law, and that the defendant intended to repay the victim for the prior lawful act.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.