Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 P2D 408 - State v. Christensen

State v. Christensen’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

1 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably State v. Ramirez (1991), State v. Larocco (1990)

1 district · 24 state decisions

16019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In exigent cireumstances, the judgment of a police officer as to probable cause will serve as sufficient authorization for a search, Le., a search warrant is unnecessary where there is probable cause to search an automobile stopped on the highway, for the car is movable, ... and the car's contents may never be found again if a warrant must be obtained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]or this exception to apply, the police must have probable cause to believe that the automobile contains either contraband or evidence of a crime and that they may be lost if not immediately seized.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]arrantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable unless exigent circumstances require action before a warrant can be obtained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.