Fife v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2018
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. · State ex rel. Markley v. Baldwin · People v. Failla · 84 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. Carothers · United States v. Bethea
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"* * * If one of the alternative theories submitted to the jury is unsupported by substantial evidence, the general verdict must be set aside * * *." Fife v. State, Wyo., 676 P.2d 565, 568 (1984).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dangel v. State · Tanner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.