Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

676 So. 2d 11

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-06-05

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1997

1 state decisions

Relies on Sellers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Derrick Tyrone Williams appeals the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We have jurisdiction. See Sellers v. State, 591 So.2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We affirm the denial of Williams’ claim regarding consecutive minimum mandatory sentences. However, the trial court failed to address Williams’ claim that his sentences do not conform to the oral pronouncement at sentencing. Accordingly, as to this claim only, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to review the record and determine whether there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentences.

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.

THREADGILL, C.J., and BLUE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
/676/so2d/11 · .json · Public domain