Krier v. Krier’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on Blankenship v. Blankenship · 349 So. 2d 1117 - Cockrell v. World's Finest Chocolate Co., Inc. · 551 So. 2d 353 - Copeland v. Richardson · Gaudin v. Collateral Agency, Inc. · 516 So. 2d 699 - Swann v. Caylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because the Kansas court had declined to exercise jurisdiction in favor of allowing the Alabama court to decide the issues”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.