Larzelere v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 202 So. 3d 40 - Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida (2016), 739 So. 2d 568 - Ramirez v. State (1999)
5 federal appellate · 97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) When a writing or recorded statement or part thereof is introduced by a party, an adverse party may require him or her at that time to introduce any other part or any other writing or recorded statement that in fairness ought to be considered contemporaneously. An adverse party is not bound by evidence introduced under this section.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to avoid the potential for creating misleading impressions by taking statements out of context.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he purpose of the rule is to “avoid the potential for creating misleading impressions by taking statements out of context.” The proper standard for determining the admissibility of testimony under the rule is “whether, in the interest of fairness, the remaining portions of the statements should have been contemporaneously provided to the jury.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.