¶1Affirmed. See Reilly v. Barrera, 620 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Breitbart v. Zaucha, 185 So.2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966) (penalty interest presumed to be limited to defaulted payments); cf. THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd., 546 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (where the language is clear and unambiguous, the mortgage provisions control the application of the default rate of interest).
676 So. 2d 458
Stern v. Kafin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 29, 1996
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1996-05-29
Relies on Reilly v. Barrera · 546 So. 2d 1158 - THFN Realty Co. v. Kirkman/Conroy Ltd. · Breitbart v. Zaucha
Decided 1996-05-29