Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 SO2D 866 - Sanders v. Gore

Sanders v. Gore’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2012

9 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · 310 So. 2d 93 - Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. · Darville v. Texaco, Inc. · Kuebler v. Martin · Loop, Inc. v. Collector of Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “La.Code Civ. P. art. 1631 provides the trial court with the power "to require that the proceedings shall be conducted with dignity and in an orderly and expeditious manner, and to control the proceedings at the trial, so that justice is done." Furthermore, under La.Code Civ. P. art. 191, the trial court possesses inherently all of the power necessary for the exercise of its jurisdiction even though not expressly granted by law. This power certainly extends to issuance of protective orders to assure the fair administration of justice under proper circumstances. Economy Carpets Mfrs. & Dist., Inc. v. Better Bus. Bureau of Baton Rouge, La., 319 So.2d 783 (La. 1975).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A third person having an interest therein may intervene in a pending action to enforce a right related to or connected with the object of the pending action against one or more of the parties thereto by: 1) Joining with plaintiff in demanding the same or similar relief against the defendant; 2) Uniting with defendant in resisting the plaintiffs demand; or 3) Opposing both plaintiff and defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Ms. Sanders also alleges an abuse of the attorney/client relationship. Although this court finds Mr. Gore's actions ethically reprehensible, Louisiana law does not prohibit sexual relationships between attorneys and their clients.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.