Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 SO2D 897 - Skaggs v. State

Skaggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 733 So. 2d 214 - Watts v. State (1999), 786 So. 2d 372 - Sharp v. State (2001)

46 state decisions

250199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Doggett v. United States · Taylor v. Illinois · United States v. Loud Hawk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The constitutional right to a speedy trial attaches at the time a person is effectively accused of a crime.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 742 So. 2d 1205 - Evans v. State · 754 So. 2d 598 - Taylor v. State
  2. “Unless good cause be shown, and a continuance duly granted by the court, all offenses for which indictments are presented to the court shall be tried no later than two hundred seventy (270) days after the accused has been arraigned.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 750 So. 2d 552 - Davis v. State · 911 So. 2d 447 - Stark v. State
  3. “are (1) the length of delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3) assertion of the right to a speedy trial, and (4) prejudice to the defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 872 So. 2d 763 - Wesley v. State · 786 So. 2d 372 - Sharp v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.