Huffman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2006
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. United States · Santobello v. New York · Ex Parte Young · Escobedo v. State · Farris v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“misleading advice as to the state's ability to assure him of leniency from the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of EQ“with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Booker v. State“knowing and intelligent waiver of his constitutional rights,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Matter of EQ
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.