Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 SW2D 82 - Kindle v. Keene

Kindle v. Keene’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 2017

5 state decisions

201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lynch v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad · Bayne v. Jenkins · Cook v. Cox · Dorman v. East St. Louis Railway Co. · Kuzuf v. Gebhardt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “are synonymous and need not be separately defined). Defendant contends that the instruction offered by plaintiff would lead a jury to believe that this is not a case involving negligence but, rather, one of strict liability. Plaintiff in this case tendered the following definition:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.