Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 676 SW2D 831 - State v. Fitzpatrick

State v. Fitzpatrick’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Tolliver (1992), State v. Fassero (2008)

26 state decisions

1201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Jones v. Barnes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The decision to call for a mistrial is in this respect quite different from the decision to forego a fundamental constitutional right such as the right to counsel (Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938)), or the combination of rights relinquished by the entering of a guilty plea (Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969)). In these latter instances, there must be ‘an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.’ Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 464 , 58 S.Ct. at 1023 ; see also Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. at 243 , 89 S.Ct. at 1712 . However, it is clear that the voluntary waiver standard of Johnson v. Zerbst does not apply to the decision to request a mistrial. [United States v.] Dinitz, 424 U.S. [600] at 609 n. 11, 96 S.Ct. [1075] at 1080 n. 11 [ 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976)].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.