Snowden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2013
1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · Lutz v. City of York · Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board · 25 Cal. App. 4th 391 - People v. Heilman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Other crimes, wrongs or acts: Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity of absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kendall v. State“the admission of the prior conviction was relevant to show the absence of accident”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.