James R. Snyder Co. v. Associated General Contractors of America, Detroit Chapter, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.2d 1111 · 1982
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2024
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers v. Pennington · United Mine Workers of America v. M Pennington Local Union No 189 Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America · Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex Hospital · Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States · McLain v. Real Estate Board of New Orleans, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are aware that a conflict exists between the circuits regarding McLain. The Ninth Circuit has held that Sherman Act jurisdiction exists when any business activity of a defendant affects interstate commerce. Western Waste Service v. Universal Waste Control, 616 F.2d 1094 (9th Cir.1980). Under a more conservative view of the reach of the Sherman Act, the Tenth Circuit has taken the position that a defendant’s illegal activities must affect interstate commerce for jurisdiction to be present. In the instant case, because the evidence supports a finding that defendants’ alleged illegal actions affected interstate commerce, we need not decide whether Sherman Act jurisdiction could be founded solely on proof that defendants’ general business activity affects interstate commerce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(d) Statements which are not hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if— (2) Admission by party-opponent. The statement is offered against a party and is ... (E) a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Earle v. Benoit
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.