Baucom v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.2d 1346 · 1982
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2017
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steffel v. Thompson · Lewis v. United States · Lascaris v. Shirley · In re Neagle · Morningside Renewal Council, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1]f the prisoner is held in the state court to answer for an act which he was authorized to do by the law of the United States, which it was his duty to do as marshal of the United States, and if, in doing that act, he did no more than what was necessary and proper for him to do, he cannot be guilty of a crime under the law of the state of California.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Idaho v. Horiuchi“not per se unlawful ... [and] is a recognized technique commonly utilized in narcotic cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kentucky v. Long
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.