Mancuso v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.2d 206 · 1982
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably United States v. Alexander (1984), Engle v. Koehler (1983)
25 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Sandstrom v. Montana · Cupp v. Naughten · Standefer v. United States · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Everyone is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act and unless the act is done under circumstances or conditions that might preclude the existence of such an intent, you, the jury, have to find, have the right to find the requisite intent from the proven actions of an individual.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Everyone is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act and unless the act is done under circumstances or conditions that might preclude the existence of such intent, you, the jury, have to find, have a right to find the requisite intent from the proven actions of an individual.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rivera v. Coombe · Rock v. Coombe“the question is not whether the trial court failed to isolate and cure a particular ailing instruction, but rather whether the ailing instruction by itself so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramirez v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.