New Jersey Air National Guard v. Federal Labor Relations Authority’s Empirical Analysis
677 F.2d 276 · 1982
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2021 · most notably Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group (1993), Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp. (2011)
63 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 976 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 32 U.S.C. § 709 (National Guard Technicians Act of 1968) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7101 · 5 U.S.C. § 7103 · 5 U.S.C. § 7106
Relies on Morton v. Mancari · United States v. Borden Co. · Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. · United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. · Gilligan v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). To provide uniformity and afford national guard technicians the emoluments of federal service, "all Guard technicians, who had previously been employees of the states, were declared to be federal employees, and were thereby afforded the benefits and rights generally provided for federal employees in the civil service.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law....”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“section 709(e) must be read to override any conflicting provisions of law in existence at the time that the Technicians Act was enacted.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.